鲜花( 21) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:/ T; _& W1 { D
( s, S3 T- S( c Q/ g6 e. x
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。# P- X& j- g' N( Q8 x% s
) Y0 A% R! ]5 V/ J) R T, C
**********************************; s, p; b$ i @) ~
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:: V `* u" s( J$ {3 V
2 l9 h* W+ v" ?* D
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.5 c$ }9 W4 H2 T1 ]
& d/ a" p7 W" I( b: n: _
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.: }" q! a" g; ?7 x `! M
. q/ N6 o: O8 R
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
" c. K4 }6 K/ r) X) }: \6 v' a8 P' }; @
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
/ ?3 S/ ]- x/ z( _) ?6 L- d
5 q4 R- d5 K7 }, Y. D( x' |: n5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|