鲜花( 21) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:. N. f) D7 Q0 L$ p# @% I6 l4 t; \8 {
7 G2 Q1 Y, w* O4 e: H
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
, @4 T9 @7 f/ _# F/ c+ Z
( }* Z' C* [) H7 S) G9 j+ M7 f**********************************6 \6 J: w: I X
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:8 `1 F% y6 t& f
+ Y9 B8 T# x0 Z" v) T0 M1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
! E$ P8 z" W# {* \
w/ e2 K5 ]: u9 B% S2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8." N+ c1 S7 D) r4 a3 i+ r
2 F( E9 Q: G/ p4 M8 n+ }; l
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.( ^" {9 Z) T+ {& Q
) G% p5 @8 Y* c0 N
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
% |8 \2 k% y; H$ u8 f1 F" v. B% R, n0 X' K
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|